that's correct. one of the two diaphragms has two ports, so just block the extra port.kitchman wrote:from what you are stating even if the vac. advance has three hoses it can be used if one sub.-diaphram port is capped off.
i would just look at the cap and rotor and replace them if they're badly worn. the coils and igniters don't often go bad, in my experience. even if you replace the cap, rotor, and vac cans, that should still be quite a bit less than $100.kitchman wrote:Your opinion on if it is prudent for $100 getting a rebuilt dissy.(new cap, rotor,coil, ignitor etc) allready to go vs. transplanting the new vac. advance into a 30 year old dissy.?
if the vac cans were hooked up when you checked the timing, the reading would have been incorrect since the manifold vac line would have been sucking air through the ruptured diaphragm, thus making it a vacuum leak. i would disconnect both vac advance lines and block them, and remove the air filter housing and check all the other lines for vacuum leaks first, and then check the timing. it may indeed still need to be adjusted but you have to eliminate those leaks first to get a true reading.kitchman wrote:With the vac. advance inoperative would my initial timing observation of approx. 25 BTDC degrees to be expected? Just trying to figure out whether or not the dissy. is in correctly or did someone in the past tweak it so the car would run better without addressing the vac. advance issue.